Philosophy of Grammar
The way in which we speak and often reflect the way that we think. And the way that we think can often be informed my memory and experiences. That’s what we end up thinking cannot affect our actions based on memories and experiences which often has something to do with the structure of our language. That’s why formulating questions about grammar in the philosophy of grammar could be of outpost importance.
The way in which we describe certain things based on the tense or the aspect of language, can be very interesting to consider.
Tents can be broken down into three basic parts: past, present, and future. But then these can be modified by the perfect or the progressive. The perfect has the aspect of adding the words has, have, had and this indicates that something had been done in the past or has been done in the past or that it will have been done in the past. The progressive usually ends with the -ing ending.
Magic can occur in some sense of the word that is to say when you can bind all these together when you create the present progressive or when you create the present perfect progressive for the past perfect progressive or the future perfect progressive. The present perfect often is the best way to link the past in the present that is to say from the philosophical perspective an action or the existence of being has begun in the past and then continues on into the future — this is the present perfect. When you add the progressive, you can indicate that something has been going on in the past and is continually occurring into the future.
Often you could see things in multiple different ways and this would inform them as having occurred in the same different way than you ultimately describe it in the same way.
For example one could say that they have eaten in the past on Tuesday or they say that they eight. One is in the past tense and one is in the past perfect tense. Ultimately they could describe the same thing you could say you ate on Tuesday and you could also say that you had eaten on Tuesday as well. Or these could temporarily refer back to the same thing that has occurred. Thus the structure of grammar can ultimately refer to the same object that has occurred in the past affecting the subject in different ways. This is important because different modes of speaking could be construed as indicating some thing else but really in the same vein the different modes of speaking and writing could indicate the same thing.
This is not necessarily a reference in regards to language games as a one Wittgenstein envisioned them in terms of finding what the definition of a word is. Instead the social contacts can be conflated and is not always clear. Thus language can be used to obfuscate what was meant and a pie and adhere to traditional notes of grammar of what was really meant. Depending on the social context and depending on what the intent of the riders were, the definition and the meaning can change from a Temporel standpoint.
© Charles Edward Andrew Lincoln IV
© Charles Edward Andrew Lincoln IV
